今天吧啦一下讨论类话题的写作方式！ 通常情况下，讨论类题目的提问方式是：Discuss both views and give your own opinion。 两步走，第一“讨论双方观点”，第二个“给出自己的观点”。确定文章的结构。 开头段背景句+双方题目转述(不需要表达个人观点) Body 1讨论题目中第一个观点的合理性Body 2讨论题目中第二个观点的合理性Body 3给出自己的观点 这时，很多“烤鸭”会问，结尾段呢?答案就是“可不写结尾段”! 文章的主体三个段落已经完全回答了题目的要求。这样的写法，考官也用，以《剑桥真题6》第二篇范文为例。 Successful sports professions can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Body 1 (论述为什么有的人认为“体育明星的高收入不公平”) Many people find their rewards unfair, especially when comparing these super salaries with those top surgeons or research scientists, or even leading politicians who have the responsibility of governing the country. However, sports salaries are not determined by considering the contribution to society a persona makes, or the level of responsibility he or she holds. Instead, they reflect the public popularity of sports in general and the level of public support that successful stars can generate. So the notion of ‘fairness’ is not the issue. Body 2 (论述为什么有的人认为“体育明星的高收入是合理的”) Those who feel that sports stars’ salaries are justified might argue that the number of professionals with real talent are very few, and the money is a recognition of the skills and dedication a person needs to be successful. Competition is constant and a player is tested every time they perform in their relatively short career. The pressure from the media is intense and there is little privacy out of the spotlight. So all of these factors may justify the huge earnings.Body 3 (表明自己的观点) Personally, I think that the amount of money such sports stars make is more justified than the huge earning of movie stars, but at the same time, it indicates that our society places more value on sport than more essential professionals and achievements. 所以，对于讨论类的文章，我们只需要完全回答题目的要求就可以了，文章的结构也是特别的简单明了。
